More material...

More material...

On this page I publish more models, insights and material. You're more than welcome to contact me if you have any questions.

Business purpose vs. business value Finding a direction in a complex reality

2023-12-28, by Johan Hildingson (formerly Lagerström)

Background

In a business world characterized by shifting markets and endless possibilities, distinguishing between business purpose and true business value is crucial. However, this distinction is not always clear. Business strategy, tactics, goals, and purpose interact in a complex pyramid structure where boundaries are fluid and often subject to debate. This is where methods (e.g. goal modeling), established models (e.g. UML) and discussions (e.g. workshops) etc. become essential, acting as a compass in a world of relative values and multifaceted ambitions.

Business purpose vs Business value

Let's begin by exploring the definitions of "Business Purpose" and "Business Value". Further, these two words are stipulative definitions, meaning we as humans have assigned them a meaning (i.e. through a biased definition). Nonetheless, among the definitions that exist, the following is a summarized common description:

The exact delineation between the concepts of business purpose and business value is not always clear, possibly because it's challenging to entirely separate the meanings of the two terms. However, common to the definitions that exist is the following understanding:

(Digital Leadership, 2023) (Invensis Learning, 2023) (BVOP, 2023)


Below are some examples based on well-known companies:


In summary, while the business purpose provides the fundamental reason for a company's existence and guides its mission and values, business value represents the quantifiable and qualitative benefits that a company delivers to its stakeholders, reflecting its overall health and success.

The importance of a coherence

In every business context, there's a diversity of values, often leading to conflicts. A parallel can be drawn to how Quran burnings can lead to riots, illustrating how an action in one context can evoke strong and unpredictable reactions in another. This dynamic is equally relevant in the business world.

In "Existentialism is a Humanism," Jean-Paul Sartre emphasizes that there is no predetermined purpose for humanity, advocating instead that individuals have the responsibility and freedom to choose their own paths, thereby defining what it means to be human through their actions and decisions. Sartres view aligns with Antonovsky's "Sense of Coherence" (SOC) theory. Like Sartre's existentialism, SOC emphasizes the importance of comprehending, managing, and finding meaning in our environment, reinforcing the idea that personal understanding and choice are crucial in defining our existence. This perspective also resonates with the "Johari Window" model. This model highlights the value of open communication (i.e. in the "open window") in establishing common understanding, suggesting that our self-awareness and interactions with others are key in shaping our identity and understanding of the world.

Caption: Jean-Paul Sartre's "Existentialism is a Humanism" highlights existentialism's core principle of individual freedom and responsibility, emphasizing our role in shaping our lives and defining humanity through our choices. Notably, Sartre was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1964, which he famously declined.

Caption: The image depicts the SOC model. It proposes that we, as humans, need to have the three components to be able to feel a sense of coherence.

Caption: The image shows the "Johari Window". The model suggests that it is in the Open Area where the best communication occurs.

Complicated and complex - Choose your reality

Leadership plays a crucial role in navigating these complex waters. The contrast between strong individual leaders and collective community can be likened to influencers versus traditional TV channels. We choose what to follow and believe in, as somethings is too complicated to explain - that's why we choose based on our feelings.

In this context, the Cynefin (pronounced "kuh-nev-in") framework is relevant. The Cynefin framework is a conceptual framework used to facilitate decision making. It was created in 1999 by Dave Snowden, while working for IBM Global Services, and has been described as a "sense-making device". The framework emphasize the difference between complicated and complex environments. In a complex world, we can't always grasp all aspects; sometimes, we must simply accept certain elements as they are. 

The complex world is also discussed in the theory called "the Munchausen trilemma". The theory presents three "deadlocks" in knowledge validation: circular reasoning, infinite regression, and dogmatism.

These frameworks, models, and theories all emphasize the importance of accepting complex things as they are, because we humans can't fully understand complex reality. This acceptance is crucial, not just in navigating the complexities of the business world but also in recognizing our cognitive limitations.

Caption: Complicated things can be understood by humans through deduction. However, complex things cannot be fully understood, as they are highly advanced. For instance, we cannot always predict a tsunami, but they have devastating consequences. That is why the Cynefin framework emphasizes the importance of robustness and resilience for complex matters.

Our failure to fully grasp the complexity of a full reality, shaped by our cognitive limitations, manifests in a tendency to repeat historical mistakes. This cycle of repetition, particularly evident in the persistence of wars, highlights a profound challenge in human society. As discussed in "Global Affairs Explained": "Human nature has not changed. Although civilization has softened some aspects of the human condition... fighting and conflict are still natural ways for people to resolve their differences."​ (GLA, 2020)​. The article underlines the critical need for resilience and adaptability in leadership and societal structures. 

But what, then, is the meaning of it all, if we, as humans, cannot fully comprehend the complex reality and are doomed to repeat the same mistakes over and over again? This question leads us to crucial insights from Robert Sapolsky, an American neuroendocrinologist and author, and whom I consider to be one of the most intelligent and motivating individuals I am aware of. Reflecting on life's essence through the lens of dopamine, Robert Sapolsky once shared a thought-provoking insight:

Be very careful about what you strive for in life. What is realistic, and what are you willing to sacrifice to achieve it? Perhaps this is the key to understanding dopamine. It's about motivated anticipation. It's not about pleasure. It's not about the pursuit of happiness, but about the happiness in the pursuit.
(Robert Sapolsky, 2021)

Dopamine is one of the brain's most potent neurotransmitters. It activates our drive to accomplish tasks and experience rewards, motivating us in life. Sapolsky encapsulates the concept of a complex world, emphasizing that the journey often holds more value than the actual goal itself. This insight is especially pertinent in the business world, e.g. when considering the interplay between strategy and tactics. The business is a complex phenomena and in this context, each step taken towards a goal can be as crucial and meaningful as the goal itself - if not more.

An example of a complicated model for a complex reality

I was recently at a client meeting with a large insurance company, at the lunch break I discussed models with one of their actuaries. I mentioned that there are no complete models; they are merely simplifications of a complex reality - that's why they are called "models". The actuary quickly countered, citing mathematics as an example of a complete model. To illustrate my point, I brought up the Collatz Conjecture, demonstrating how even fundamental mathematical concepts can embody profound complexity.

The Collatz Conjecture is a mathematical puzzle that starts with any positive integer. If the number is even, it's halved; if odd, it's tripled and one is added. Repeating this process, the conjecture states that you will eventually reach the number 1, regardless of which number you start with.

This simple yet unsolved phenomenon, which cannot be fully explained by scientists, underscores the limitations of our mathematical models in capturing the complexities of reality. As we engage with such challenges to understand complexity, we humans fulfill our need to comprehend and find order, a pursuit that is inherently valuable. Our interpretations of the world are shaped by these models, reflecting our choice of perceived reality. 

This quest for knowledge and our desire to make sense of the world is evident in our reliance on models. In exploring puzzles like the Collatz Conjecture or phenomena in physics, we find purpose and a sense of belonging. Models such as Bohr's atomic theory, quantum mechanics, and string theory, each developed from a unique perspective, aim to simplify the complexities of reality but only capture a fraction of it. For example, Bohr's model laid the groundwork, quantum mechanics offered a deeper understanding, and string theory introduced the concept of one-dimensional "strings". Yet, all these models, despite their advancements, are incomplete, illustrating that our understanding of reality, influenced by our perceptions, is an ongoing approximation of a much broader and intricate reality.

In acknowledging that models are not reality but simplifications designed to make complex reality more comprehensible, we recognize their value in our endeavor to understand the world. These models, with their inherent limitations, remind us that our knowledge, while constantly expanding, is shaped by the simplifications we create. The models serve as a tool to help us understand reality a little better. So, does the simplification by the models diminish our drive? Personally, I don't think so. Instead, it motivates us, fueling our enthusiasm for life and prompting us to acknowledge the inherent limitations in our representations of reality.

Caption: The Collatz Conjecture proposes a sequence where any positive integer is eventually reduced to 1, highlighting the complexity hidden within simple mathematical rules.

The complex phenomenon of the coherence "Business"

What does this mean for the business world? Well, it means that there is no absolute right or wrong way to define a company's purpose or value. It's about the choices we make within the frameworks in which we operate. The classic problem of distinguishing between purpose and goal, strategy and tactic, is less about their objective definitions and more about the subjective interpretations and choices made within an organization. The important thing is not what these elements are in themselves, but rather how they are perceived and how they interact to create a common purpose that adds value. A sense of coherence in a complex phenomenon.

Therefore, it's important to define the purpose based on the value you want to create, making it comprehensible, manageable, and meaningful for all involved. This creates a sense of coherence - essential for all successful businesses. The Munchausen trilemma illustrates the challenges we face in this process, but it's also a reminder of the importance of accepting that some things cannot be "solved" in a traditional way.

Finally, it's important that we as individuals and as organizations acknowledge that our success is not solely defined by external circumstances or concrete goals. It's a continuous process of self-reflection, adaptation, and development. By focusing on our inner value and purpose, we can create a meaningful and sustainable path forward, both for ourselves and for the organizations we are part of.

Embracing the Journey: Extracting Business Insights from "The Boy, the Mole, the Fox, and the Horse"

In Charlie Mackesy's "The Boy, the Mole, the Fox, and the Horse," a profound narrative unfolds within a mysterious forest, where a young boy embarks on an extraordinary journey alongside a wise horse, a curious mole, and a kind-hearted fox. As they navigate through the forest's challenges, the boy grapples with uncertainties about the path ahead.

The transformative moment in this tale arises when, feeling overwhelmed and lost, the boy turns to the horse for guidance. With wisdom and compassion, the horse imparts a valuable lesson:

"Can you see the next step? If you can, then take it."

This statement encourages the boy to shift his focus from the entirety of the unknown journey or the distant destination to the immediate next step. It underscores the courage required to take that step, even when the path ahead seems unclear.

In the business context, where organizations frequently encounter unpredictable challenges and opportunities, this message resonates profoundly. It encourages professionals to shift their perspective and understand that genuine business value isn't exclusively attained by achieving distant objectives or striving to become something they are not. It also involves appreciating and finding value in their present circumstances while focusing on each step of the journey. The forest, symbolizing the ever-evolving business landscape, parallels the experiences of individuals and organizations navigating the intricacies of the corporate world, characterized by moments of uncertainty, wonder, and exploration.

Summary

So, what can we learn from this? Perhaps it's that the relationship between business purpose and true business value, while often viewed as distinct, are actually deeply intertwined. These concepts, shaped by the choices and interpretations within an organization, complement each other in a nuanced interplay. Purpose steers a company's direction, shaping the type of value it aims to create. Yet, the path towards clear goals and purposes is often meandering and influenced by our perceptions. 

Embracing these fluctuations, challenges, and shifts is essential for fostering growth, learning, and reevaluation. Ultimately, success in the business world hinges on understanding that it's not just about achieving external milestones, but also about nurturing an internal sense of coherence, adaptability, and sustainable development that aligns purpose with value.  And, achieving enduring and meaningful business success hinges on seamlessly integrating purpose and value, recognizing their intrinsic interdependence, while humbly acknowledging the inherent complexity of the reality. 

As we navigate this intricate landscape, it often becomes clear that the journey itself is where we find the profound essence of purpose and value. This realization brings to light that, in many cases, the path we tread is even more valuable than the destination we aim for. It's on this journey that we uncover lessons, insights, opportunities, and transformations that are indispensable. These experiences remind us that the process is just as important, if not more so, than the end goal. Perhaps, in this revelation, we discover that the true purpose is embedded not just in reaching our destination (i.e. goals and values), but also in the journey towards it.

My top pro tips

 

 

Stress – Only evil and bad?

2023-04-05, by Johan Hildingson (formerly Lagerström)

Stress is part of people's everyday lives today. Important and crucial decisions that have to be made, life puzzles that have to be put together, means of transport that are delayed, the presentation tomorrow, what to eat for the weekend and much more... But what is stress, how does it affect us and is all kinds of stress bad? In this post we explore the function of stress for us humans.

The frontal lobes – Consciousness, coherence and rational thinking

The human is descended from the primates. What sets humans apart from the primates is spelled: homo sapiens sapiens – i.e. the specie who is aware of that that she thinks. Humans have a consciousness; she is aware that she is thinking. This consciousness is created in the frontal lobes of the brain. (Hansen et. al., 2022)

The frontal lobes are part of the cerebral cortex and are located behind the frontal bone. They are what enable us to plan for the future, as well as control our impulses when we perceive that there is a future reward to be had (and by that also our pleasure patterns). This is where we get an overview and a perspective of things. (Phillips, 2022)

The frontal lobes aren't fully developed until the age of 20-25. This explains why impulse control is not fully developed amongst younger people. Compassion, empathy and meaningfulness are also qualities that depend on the frontal lobes being well integrated. It is the frontal lobes that create a sense of meaningful coherence. That's why it's important for humans to feel a coherence. (Antonovsky, 1990) (Hansen et. al., 2022)

The coherence is so important that people even become stressed when the context and coherence are missing. As a primate (10,000 years ago) it was dangerous to be alone, you did not have the protection of the herd. Even today, this mechanism still exists. This is why the frontal lobes are extra sensitive to stress. (Hansen et. al., 2022)

Cortisol – Stress and getting ready to fight or flee

When we become stressed, cortisol is secreted from the adrenal glands, which triggers the release of a large amount of glucose. The glucose is energy that are used used in order to deal with the stressful situation. Adrenaline and nor-adrenaline are also secreted during stress. The adrenaline increases the heart rate so that more blood circulates and makes the respiratory tract to relax so that we can breathe in more oxygen. Sweat is secreted so that the warm muscles can cool down and function well. The nor-adrenaline makes the cognitive functions prioritize focus and quick thinking, instead of the more rational and logical thinking of the frontal lobes. In summary: the body gets ready to fight or flee as action is more important than logical thinking. (Phillips, 2022)

Maybe you have felt thirsty when you get stressed? This is because the palate receives less blood and cannot produce saliva as well. Nausea may occur as the body wants to get rid of stomach contents, because we run better on an empty stomach. You get tired because it takes a lot of energy to be on constant alert. This is also why long-term stress makes the body prioritize other vital functions. Digesting food becomes less important (which creates stomach problems), sleep is not a priority, etc. (Phillips, 2022)

A stressful situation creates several signal substances that directly affect the body, but what then causes the body to perceive a situation as stressful?

If you point in towards the head from the top of the ears and straight in from the eyes, the lines meet exactly where the amygdala is located. The amygdala is right at the center of many of our sensory impressions. Maybe it's no coincidence that the amygdala is located there... The amygdala is kind of the body's fire alarm. It takes in sensory input and looks for threats. It works spontaneously and is close to all impressions (sight, hearing, smell, taste, etc.). The amygdala can even sound the alarm before we process the information to the frontal lobe and become aware of the threat, in other words: we act before we become aware. There's a good Dutch saying: "You hear the alarm, but you don't know where the bell is." (>>>). The amygdala controls the more primitive parts of the brain and makes us think instinctively, quickly and decisively. (Hansen et. al., 2022)

So how do you make good decisions in stressful situations?

It is not uncommon for us humans to make decisions under pressure. In emergency healthcare this is everyday life. In emergency healthcare a lot of work is done to enable rational thinking during stressful situations. Some of the methods used there are:


A lot of stress management focus on making yourself aware of that you are stressed and that it can affect your rational thinking and therefore decision-making. With the awareness that you are stressed, you can also give yourself time to relieve the stress and act more rationally. If you know that you are in a stressful situation, you should also take in more perspectives, to compensate for your narrower and less rational thinking.

The feeling of being in control of the stress is especially important. Studies show that if a subject is forewarned of an electric shock, the electric shock hurts less. The person does not need to tense up unnecessarily and feels safer and can adapt. In healthcare, this is handled, among other things, by notifying the emergency hospitals of incoming patients, so that the staff have time to prepare and become aware of what is to come. Communication in the stressful situation also helps, as it creates a sense of joint control of the situation. (Mental health foundation, 2020) (Hansen et. al., 2022)

Stress can be controlled if you practice it, but most scientist agree that it must be done situation by situation - this since stress is the perception of not having control over a specific situation. In fact, the thought of a stressful situation has the same effect as actually being in a stressful situation, this as the amygdala reacts to the parts of the brain that are activated by the thought of a stressful situation. (Hansen et. al., 2022) (Phillips, 2022)

Breathing exercises are effective during a stressful situation. By controlled breathing you reduce cortisol secretion and instead increase serotonin and oxytocin – signaling substances that create the feeling of coherence, control and satisfaction. In fact, in cases of stress the body releases oxytocin after a while, to create the calming effect after the stress. Just the feeling that the stress is an experience that will naturally pass can be calming. (Antonovsky, 1990) (Phillips, 2022)

Also enabling the body do produce dopamine can decrease the cortisol secretion. Dopamine is what motivates us humans to start doing something, e.g. start reading a book, start writing a report or go for a walk - or even better: hit the gym. Dopamine is the body's reward system that makes us want to do something and keep doing it. Dopamine creates more dopamine, so just by starting more motivation will come - in science it's called "momentum of dopamine". (Field et. al., 2015) (Phillips, 2022)

In a stressful situation you can also break down the challenge you are facing into smaller components. The smaller components provide motivation as they feel comprehensible, manageable and meaningful (i.e. "a sense of coherence"). Motivation gets us started and going (i.e. momentum). In addition, the breakdown makes us feel that we are in control of the situation, it may not be as dangerous as our amygdala wants us to think. (Antonovsky, 1990) (Phillips, 2022)

Summary

Cortisol is often called the hormone of death, but that is not entirely fair. Without cortisol, life would be dull and gray. We don't hate stress, we just hate the wrong kind of stress. In fact, we even pay for good stress, such as riding a roller coaster or watching crime series. Stress is good when it is adequate, transitory and when we feel that we have control – in those cases the stress even contributes to euphoria (i.e. endorphins).

Stress makes us focus more, become actionable and gives us the opportunity to feel upcoming reward. It gets us going and ready for action, which can create momentum. Our cortisol levels are high in the morning, because it gets us started and take on the wonderful day.

The important thing is to create healthy stress that motivates and engages us, and minimize stress that makes us act less and less rationally or inclusively. It is by activating motivation that we get the opportunity to experience new things, experience excitement, challenge problems and learn new things. Stress is not always bad, it's a part of being human and can (!) be vital and good (i.e. in the right doses and situations).

My top pro tips

This exercise activates the parasympathetic system, which increases serotonin and oxytocin levels in the body. This in turn lowers cortisol levels effectively and quickly. The sigh gets the carbon dioxide out well and activates the vagus nerve, which makes you feel calm (maybe you recognize this from the monks). You can do the exercise ten minutes before the speech – but also evening before the speech, as science shows that the body has a physical memory. (Diploma, 2022) (Phillips et. al., 2022)

 

 

The organizational needs ladder - How to understand the phases of an organization 

2022-08-10, by Johan Hildingson (formerly Lagerström)

Background

Maslow's hierarchy of needs (Maslow, 1943) is a theory of motivation which states that five categories of human needs dictate an individual's behavior. The theory was published 1943 under the title "A Theory of Human Motivation" in the journal Psychological Review. 

Today the model is often used when describing the current state of humans in different society contexts. The hierarchy of needs is a psychological idea and also an assessment tool, particularly used in education, healthcare and social work (Poston, 2009). The hierarchy is also a popular framework in sociology research, including management training and higher education (Freitas et. al., 2011). Even though psychology isn't a science subject, this model is well-established and widely accepted.

The "organizational needs ladder"

In the model below I have interpreted Maslow's model and translated into a corporate world. This is with the purpose of describing the typical phases a organization can be in. I often use the model when I quickly try to familiarize myself with the organization and its situation, and by that roughly understand what their needs may be. It also gives me a hint of what challenges the organization has and what they want to strive for and move towards.

When you are about to shop at your grocery store, you probably write a shopping list (a todo list) and you say "I have an errand in town". But the shopping list is not the valuable thing, you can write it on a post-it, you can write in a notes app of your mobile phone, or you can memorize it... The real value is what the written words means (i.e. the information) and that you buy it (i.e. process and actors), with the goal of being able cook dinner at home (i.e. goals) and by that fulfilling the purpose of being able to survive (i.e. the purpose). If you were to say to your partner that "I have an errand" and wave the note, she/he may be annoyed...

- Well, what errand?!
- Yes, an errand!
- Yeah?!

Instead, you probably usually say something like...
- I was thinking of buying food for tonight at the grocery store, I was thinking Swedish meatballs - what do you think? Do we need anything else?

So, in our private life we are often (not always!) at step 4 or 5, trying to fulfill ourselves in a coherence and take care of our joint values.

Summary

In closing, in this article I try to put forward the idea that organizations may progress much like individuals, evolving from focusing on basic survival to ultimately contributing to society. This concept invites reflection on the broader role of businesses in our communities. How does your organization, or one you're familiar with, navigate this journey? Where does it currently stand on this "ladder", and what steps could it take towards greater societal impact? Your insights and experiences are valuable in enriching this discussion and understanding the diverse paths organizations take in their quest for growth and purpose. Consider sharing your thoughts and observations with others, fostering a wider dialogue about the transformative journey of organizations.

My top pro tips

Bonus - The consultant ladder

And yes... Of course, I have a model that explains the consulting world as well. After all, I've been working as a consultant for 20 years. This article introduces the Trust-Driven Consultant Ladder, a conceptual framework drawing upon Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs and the insights of David H. Maister, Charles H. Green, and Robert M. Galford in "The Trusted Advisor". The model synthesizes these profound insights with my two decades of professional experience, offering a unique perspective on the evolution of client-consultant relationships.



The Consultant Ladder," informed by insights from "The trusted advisor" and my own consulting experiences, is designed to offer guidance and reflection in the consulting field. It integrates essential aspects such as credibility, reliability, intimacy, and a balanced self-orientation, presenting them as key components for a consultant's journey rather than strict rules.


By sharing this ladder I hope to contribute to the broader dialogue in the consulting industry. This model is a personal narrative, combining foundational trust principles with practical experiences, and is shared with the aspiration of encouraging others in the field to find their unique paths and create significant, positive change in their professional and broader community engagements. 

And remember... The true measure of any model's worth is its ability to resonate with and enrich your personal experiences and aspirations. Ultimately, it's about discovering your unique contribution, that intersection where your skills and passions align with the world's needs (i.e. "Ikigai") - a powerful insight that can redefine not just your career, but your impact on the world around you.

 

 

The corporate triangle - People don't like change, they like improvements

2022-07-22, by Johan Hildingson (formerly Lagerström)

Introduction

It's often said that people of a business are the business itself. The problem with that statement is that people are individuals that need a coherence. According to Dunbar (Dunbar, 1992) a human can handle a coherence of maximum 150 relations. This implies that the number of perceptions of the world is as many as the people living in it. Therefore, there isn't one world, there are many. 

In this article, we delve into the complex interplay of individual perspectives within the corporate world, and we explore how these varied viewpoints shape the business landscape. 

The reality of diverse perspectives

In science the philosophical discussion of what is true science and what isn't (i.e. pseudo-science) is in fact a part of being a scientist. In each research the scientist defines the problem she wants to investigate and then operationalize it. The operationalization implies that you as a scientist have to define the problem in measurable terms. 

For example, you as a scientist want to understand how many people in the world that have access to clean water. In order to research this, you as a scientist need to define what e.g. "clean", "access" and "water" is. One scientist may say it's 10 liters a day of water from a local well that doesn't cause illness within 7 days. Another scientist may say the access to water also includes the water we get from eating food. A third scientist may say it's the ability to take a bath in a river within a walk of 10 km.

It is the scientist that decides how to operationalize the problem definition, with her perception and knowledge of the world and the hypothesis of the problem she is interested in. She can't know everything, that's why she has to scope it by operationalizing it by her hypothesis and means.

Is this a problem that we humans can't perceive the full facts? No, according to Richard Haier (professor, scientist and psychologist at Irvine School of Medicine) the worst thing that can happen is that you prove that your hypothesis is wrong. And if you're biased and your results aren't fully true, then future studies will show other results than yours. A failure is just an opportunity to begin again more intelligently. The fact is that the results are just simplified versions of the world/reality, they are models. Models are simplifications of the reality so that we humans can understand it a bit better. So, the models aren't the reality. (See also the article above, regarding business purpose and business value).

The exploration of diverse perspectives in science, particularly the philosophical debate around true science versus pseudo-science, is a crucial element of being a scientist.

Caption: Multiple perspectives may each hold a fragment of truth, offering valid insights within their scope yet representing only a piece of the larger and complex reality. Our understanding is shaped by these perspectives, which, like puzzle pieces, create a complex mosaic of the corporate world and beyond, inviting us to seek a more holistic comprehension.

Implications for business

In business, similar to science, we must recognize that individuals have diverse perceptions of a context. A business exists both as an entity and as a multitude of perceptions shaped by the coherence of these perspectives.  There is a "business" as well as there are several perceptions of it, and it depends of the coherence. 

A business strategy from one coherence (e.g. the vision of the board) isn't always the same thing as the culture (i.e. a group of people and their actions). And the culture may vary depending on the individual people in it, in fact – some people may not be a part of one "culture". And all these factors together result in how our business execution is working.

Caption: It's not always that people in a company are a part of a company culture. And it's not always that the culture is aligned with the company strategy.

So, in a business we have to be humble to that there are many perceptions of what our business is. One perception doesn't need to be more "correct" than the other, they just exist and are. It is by continuous work, communication (i.e. inclusion) and improvements we set a common direction and create a coherence. When individuals are included in the decision-making process, they have the opportunity to contribute their unique perspectives, thus becoming integral contributors to valuable improvements. This collaborative approach not only enhances the quality of the changes implemented but also ensures a more inclusive and representative outcome, resonating with a broader range of experiences and insights within the organization. Because in the end: people don't like change, they like improvements.

This understanding aligns with the reality of diverse perspectives, which is fundamental in both science and business. Embracing these diverse viewpoints is key to advancing our knowledge and achieving success, demonstrating the significance of multiple perspectives in understanding and navigating the complexities of the world. (See more about this in the article about business purpose and value)

Layers of human coherences - Understanding the complexity of individual perspectives

Caption: People are individuals in different levels of context.

Another way of looking at the phenomenon is to understand that in each given context, humans are involved in different degrees of human contexts. People themselves have a context. Everyone is an individual and each individual has their specific context. (Antonovsky, 1990) 

Adam likes sailing, Frank likes cycling. The individual is part of a larger context than just himself, in a group of people - a team. Team Alfa is interested in AI, team Beta is interested in football and Chelsy league. And the team is a part of a context that is bigger than just the team. Team Alfa is part of a development organization at a company, team Beta is part of a football fan club. And you can extend this view of different degrees of context all the way up to e.g. context of a society or even human kind.

“Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success. If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself.”
(Henry Ford, 1903)

What can we learn from this? People have different contexts and that the contexts exist at different levels. When we try to solve a problem at the company level, we must understand that teams and individuals are some of the context that must be included and taken into account. And to be sure that the problem the company tries to solve is a problem worth spending time on, we need to ensure that solving problem brings value to different levels of contexts. This enables the individuals to become part of the company's change executed by the teams.

Antonovsky's concept of Sense of Coherence (SOC) highlights the importance of cohesiveness within these contexts. SOC is not an individual attribute but a group phenomenon, exemplified by the various groups within a company.

The crucial interplay - Understanding perception of perspective

So, each person has their unique perception of reality, shaping the business environment with a mosaic of perceptions. But how do these insights extend beyond the corporate realm? To answer this question, let's examine an intriguing interview conducted by Lex Friedman, shedding light on the significance of perception and perspective in leadership, teamwork, and even espionage. In a compelling interview from 2020, Lex Friedman spoke with Jason Hanson, a former CIA officer who shared invaluable insights from the world of espionage. During this interview, Hanson conveyed a critical lesson applicable not only to spies but also to leaders and team members – the differentiation between perception and perspective.

Hanson explained that perception is an individual's personal viewpoint and understanding of a situation, while perspective encompasses the ability to understand and consider others' perceptions as well as one's own. This understanding is foundational in effective espionage, enabling spies to navigate complex scenarios, anticipate potential pitfalls, and maintain credibility and trust in their covert operations.

Crucially, Hanson emphasized that this perspective-perception dynamic reaches beyond espionage. It holds significant implications for leadership and collaboration. Leaders who are mindful of how their actions and decisions are perceived by their teams and organizations can cultivate trust, facilitate effective communication, and foster productive teamwork. This awareness empowers leaders to make informed choices that resonate positively with their colleagues, leading to better outcomes and stronger relationships. Hanson emphasizes the importance of both perception and perspective in becoming not only a skilled spy but also a proficient and empathetic colleague and leader.

Caption: Human beings cannot grasp the full extent of reality; we possess a perception of what we observe. However, even this perception may not align with the impartial facts of reality. In the checkerboard image, squares labeled "A" and "B" seem to be of different shades because of the shadow cast by another object, yet they are indeed the same color. This illusion, known as the Checkerboard Illusion, was highlighted by Edward H. Adelson in the 1990s and swiftly became a pivotal example in the study of visual perception. It was widely published and discussed, particularly in academic and psychological circles. In the image our perception is deceived by the chess square's surroundings and our preconceived notions about how the square should appear.

Caption: In the image above is yet another example of our perception being misled; two squares seem to differ in color because of surrounding visual cues, when they are in fact the same. Don't believe me? Cover the middle of the cube with your fingers, and you'll see. It's a vivid demonstration of how context shapes our perception, offering a glimpse into the subjective nature of our view of reality. 

These images illustrate that our perception of reality is not only shaped by our experiences, but also influenced by our senses (i.e. sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch). As humans, we assimilate these diverse sensory inputs and experiences to form our understanding of the world. Is this notion disconcerting? Well, maybe not... I would say that this is the beauty of being human - we do not apprehend the complete complexity of reality, but rather the biased portion of reality that we perceive. This leaves us with the understanding that there is always another perspective to explore.

Is there a "correct perspective"?

So let's engage in a bit of philosophical pondering within this domain... The concept of perspective is a fundamental aspect of human perception and understanding of reality. In this article we have explored the intricate interplay of diverse perspectives within the corporate world and beyond. It becomes apparent that there is no single "correct" perspective when it comes to comprehending the complexities of our reality. But maybe, the more perspectives we consider, the closer we may come to a little bit more comprehensive understanding of reality. (Hansen, 2023)

In scientific research, this multiplicity of perspectives plays a central role. Researchers spend a significant amount of their time reading reports and articles within their respective fields. Why? Well, the primary goal is to gather a multitude of perspectives to contribute to a broader and more nuanced understanding of the chosen subject matter. However, it's crucial to recognize that even the choice of the specific subject matter (and the data and understanding you collect) is inherently biased and part of a particular perspective. This realization leads us to a profound observation taught in higher education and science theory: all research can be perceived as somewhat pseudoscientific. (KTH, 2017)

Consider the varying attitudes toward natural medicine across cultures. In some societies, herbal remedies and natural treatments are regarded as scientifically validated methods of healing, deeply rooted in tradition and supported by local research. In other cultures, however, these same practices may be viewed with skepticism, seen more as pseudoscience than legitimate medicine. This divergence illustrates how our context and cultural background shape our understanding of what constitutes "scientifically proven" knowledge.  Historically, scientific consensus has often shifted. For instance, the once widely accepted belief that the Earth was flat is a prime example of how scientific 'facts' can change over time. Current scientific debates, like those surrounding climate change or nutrition science, further showcase this plurality of perspectives. Even within a shared field of study, researchers may arrive at different conclusions, underscoring the multifaceted nature of scientific inquiry. Therefore no perspective is universally "correct"; they are shaped by the subjectively chosen context and the limited prevailing understanding of the time. (IPCC, 2019) (KTH, 2017)

As Steven Pinker notes, "We are capable of exploring many different kinds of ideas, and among those ideas are the solutions to our problems". This exploration is pivotal in understanding the multifaceted nature of knowledge. Michael Gazzaniga also emphasizes our narrative nature, "We are a story-based creature, constantly constructing narratives". Our perspectives are the stories we create, evolving with new information and insights.

The existence of reality itself is a matter of perspective. While we define reality within our human terms, the truth is that reality simply "is", indifferent to our categorizations of real or unreal. This concept is illustrated by the idea that understanding our current dimension might require experiencing the next. For instance, an ant on a leaf is unaware of the world beyond, just as humans, with our limited perceptions, cannot grasp the entirety of 'reality'. Those who have experienced spiritual encounters might argue they've glimpsed another dimension, reshaping their understanding of reality and humanity's role in it. (Hansen, 2023)

In conclusion, probably there isn't a singular "right" perspective. Perspectives exist within their contexts and are shaped by individual subjective starting points. What's essential is finding value in relevant (i.e. subjective) perspectives and a sense of coherence in them, e.g. in a business. It's through diverse perspectives that we engage in meaningful discussions, enhancing our collective understanding. The goal isn't to converge on a single truth, but to find valuable and meaningful coherence (e.g. for our business) in the myriad viewpoints that make up our complex reality - that's where you find your subjectively "correct" perspective. (Harari, 2017)

Summary

In this article we have delved into the multifaceted nature of individual perspectives within the business environment. We see how each person in an organization contributes their own unique perspective, creating a complex and varied landscape of perceptions that influence business dynamics. The concept of scientific operationalization serves as a notable illustration, demonstrating how different interpretations can have a significant impact on our approach to problem-solving. This exploration underlines the importance of recognizing and valuing diverse perspectives, as each provides essential insights that contribute to the overall understanding and success of the business. 

What can we learn from this exploration then? Fundamentally, it's the crucial importance of acknowledging and embracing these diverse perspectives. In the realm of business, strategy and culture might not always be perfectly aligned due to these individual differences. Yet, by fostering inclusive communication and actively involving people in the process of change, we can shift from merely imposing change to genuinely facilitating meaningful improvements. This approach reframes change as an opportunity, not a hurdle.

In drawing conclusions, it appears beneficial to emphasize empathy, understanding, and inclusivity in the business sector. Recognizing and valuing the variety of individual differences could lead to a more unified and dynamic environment, enhancing both business dynamics and workplace harmony.

My top pro tips

 

 

Data governance - To see data as a valuable asset

2022-01-12, by Johan Hildingson (formerly Lagerström)

There are many different definitions of what DG (data governance) is, but the common goal of among all definitions (regarding governance, management and ownership) is:

"Using data to better manage the company's operations"

This is mainly done by defining and manage policies, processes (routines) and systems in order to ensure that people have safe access to high quality, correct and valuable information. Information that they need in order to make good business decisions and to lead the company towards success. Furthermore, this implies that DG controls how people in the company use data and technology, to add value to the company and its operations.

Caption: Summary of DG aspects and deliverables.

DG is thus not an IT-only function. It is an operational responsibility that requires cross-functional cooperation and stewardship. In other words: people and ownership, processes and policies / requirements. IT solutions is often needed to enable compliance/controls.

Summary of requirement deliverables of DG:


Caption: Summary of DG aspects, requirement deliveries and business context.

What about the term Data management (DM) then? DM is often interpreted as the same thing as DG. Data Governance (DG) and Data Management (DM) are intertwined yet distinct concepts in handling data within an organization, each serving specific roles:



In summary, DG sets the strategic framework and requirements for data handling. DG revolves around policies, regulations, and oversight of data usage, focusing on aspects like data ownership and compliance. DM is the technical execution that ensures these requirements are met by focusing on the practical handling and maintenance of data. DG defines the what, why, and who of data handling, and DM is about how these are technically implemented. Both are critical for maintaining the integrity and efficacy of data within an organization.

Summary

Data Governance (DG) is essential for managing a company's operations using data as a key asset. It involves defining and managing policies, processes, and systems to ensure access to high-quality, relevant, and valuable information for sound business decisions. DG isn't just an IT function; it requires cross-functional collaboration and ownership, encompassing people, processes, and IT solutions. DG sets the organizational framework for the entire data lifecycle, while Data Management (DM) handles the technical implementation. Effective DG necessitates ongoing communication, education, and adherence to set rules and processes. It's crucial to continuously update DG practices in response to new data, laws, and business changes, recognizing data as a central and significant asset.

So in summary... DG is about understanding the goals, requirements and processes around the data and its use. In BD (business development), this way of looking at needs is not new. What is new is the context (including the requirements, solutions and processes) this entails; the context of seeing data as an asset.

My top pro tips